Randomized trial shows that both HIIT and MICT improve in-class attention in children, indicating the potential for enhanced learning outcomes.
Objective The aim was to examine how high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) differentially affect in-class attention among fifth-grade students, with the goal of informing evidence-based physical education curriculum design. Methods Seventy-two children aged 10–11 years were randomly assigned to three groups: HIIT, MICT, and a control group ( n = 24 each). The HIIT group completed a 6-week intervention with three 24-minute sessions per week (≥85% maximum heart rate (HRmax)), while the MICT group performed continuous running at 60–69% HRmax at the same frequency. The control group maintained regular school activities. Exercise intensity was monitored using Polar heart rate sensors. Attention was assessed pre- and post-intervention via an intelligent video-based system analyzing four sub-indicators: head posture, gaze direction, eye openness, and facial detection, along with an overall attention score. Data were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results Both HIIT and MICT significantly improved the overall attention score ( P < 0.01). The HIIT group increased from 0.39 ± 0.08 to 0.70 ± 0.14 (a 79.5% improvement), while the MICT group rose from 0.38 ± 0.10 to 0.67 ± 0.12 (a 76.3% improvement). The HIIT group demonstrated a significantly greater improvement than the MICT group ( P < 0.01). The control group showed minor gains (31.0%; P < 0.05). Sub-indicator analysis revealed that HIIT significantly enhanced head posture and gaze direction ( P < 0.01), while MICT primarily improved facial detection ( P < 0.01). Conclusion Both high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) demonstrated positive effects on the enhancement of children’s overall in-class attention. Notably, HIIT demonstrated superior overall effects and produced significantly greater improvements across multiple attention sub-dimensions compared with MICT. These findings provide empirical support for the incorporation of HIIT into school-based physical education curricula as an effective strategy for enhancing students’ cognitive performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: