Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analyzes match outcomes in elite women's soccer, indicating key performance factors.
The rapid professionalization of women's soccer has increased match demands and interest in performance analytics at major tournaments such as the FIFA Women's World Cup. However, there remains a need for transparent and interpretable analyses linking multidimensional technical indicators with match outcome in elite women's soccer. This study analyzed 126 team–match observations from the 2023 FIFA Women's World Cup using publicly available aggregated SofaScore team–match statistics. A multidimensional technical-indicator framework covering attacking, possession,build-up, defensive, goalkeeping, and restart actions was established. Match tempo was quantified using Event Pace (technical events per minute of effective playing time), and matches were classified into fast- and slow-tempo groups using a median split. Correlation analysis, independent-samples t-tests, and an interpretable decision-tree model with ROC evaluation were applied. The tournament showed a heterogeneous tempo profile (2.05 ± 0.36 events·min −1 ). Fast-tempo matches involved more long passes, outside-box shots, successful crosses, and ground duels, whereas slow-tempo matches showed more aerial duels won and goalkeeper saves. The decision tree identified shots on target, dribbles won, possession, big chances, aerial duels won, and expected goals as key threshold-based split variables associated with winning versus not winning. The model showed high apparent discrimination (AUC = 0.969), but 10-fold cross-validation indicated more moderate performance (AUC = 0.703). The model should therefore be interpreted as a post-match explanatory classification model rather than a pre-match forecasting tool.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: