Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates improved landslide susceptibility mapping in mountainous regions, indicating enhanced predictive accuracy.
Landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) serves as a fundamental technical support for geohazard prevention and mitigation across mountainous terrains. This research constructs a multi-scale terrain unit integrated modeling framework targeting complex mountainous geomorphic settings, taking Zhenping County as the research object. Multi-resolution digital elevation model (DEM) datasets, multi-source satellite remote sensing imagery (GF-2), geological vector datasets and hydrological survey data are jointly adopted as the basic data source. The r.slopeunits module embedded in GRASS GIS is utilized to automatically segment slope units, and a comprehensive composite index S, coupling slope partition quality indicator F and model prediction accuracy metric R, is proposed to adaptively optimize two critical slope-unit hyperparameters: circular variance (c) and minimum unit area (a). Four DEM spatial resolutions (15 m, 25 m, 50 m, 100 m) are systematically calibrated with 42 groups of c–a parameter combinations to screen out the optimal slope-unit segmentation scheme (c = 0.1, a = 200,000 m2). Twelve landslide predisposing covariates covering topography, hydrology, lithology, human engineering activities and land cover are selected after multicollinearity diagnosis via Variance Inflation Factor and mean utility factor contribution evaluation. Logistic regression tree (LMT), LMT-Adaboost and LMT-Random Subspace are compared by random cross-validation and spatial block cross-validation. Parameter sensitivity analysis is further carried out to quantify the stability of model outputs against DEM resolution and slope-unit parameter perturbations. The LMT-RSM ensemble achieved the highest spatial cross-validation AUC (0.954 ± 0.019), outperforming LMT (0.925 ± 0.023) and AdaBoost-LMT (0.934 ± 0.021). The DeLong test confirmed that LMT-RSM’s superiority over LMT is statistically significant (p < 0.0001). The proportion of landslides in the very high and high susceptibility zones under the LMT-RSM model reached 95.98%, demonstrating relatively excellent spatial discrimination. This study provides an operational framework combining optimized slope units, ensemble learning, and spatially explicit validation for robust LSM in complex terrain, and offers a reproducible technical pathway for landslide risk prevention in mountainous regions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: