Key result
Platelet testing before Pipeline embolization device placement was associated with higher odds of neurologic morbidity compared to no testing (OR 3.25; 95% CI 1.10-9.61; P=0.03).
Why the study?
Does platelet testing before Pipeline embolization device treatment improve clinical outcomes in patients with unruptured aneurysms?
Cohort (n=698)
Yes
Does platelet testing before Pipeline embolization device treatment improve clinical outcomes in patients with unruptured aneurysms?
Odds Ratio: 3.25 (95% CI 1.1–9.61)
Absolute Event Rate: 8.2% vs 2.1%
p-value: p=0.03
Questions routine platelet testing before Pipeline embolization; leaves open whether testing improves outcomes in prospective trials.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The necessity for platelet-inhibition testing before aneurysm treatment in patients premedicated with antiplatelet agents is controversial. Using the International Retrospective Study of Pipeline Embolization Device registry, we studied complication rates in groups of patients who underwent platelet testing and those who did not undergo platelet testing to determine if these test results were associated with improved outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients in the International Retrospective Study of Pipeline Embolization Device registry with an unruptured aneurysm were categorized as those who underwent platelet testing before Pipeline embolization device treatment or those who did not. Complication rates were compared by using the Fisher exact or Pearson χ(2) test. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine if platelet function testing was independently associated with poor outcomes after adjusting for age, number of devices and aneurysms, aneurysm location and size, and practitioner and center volume. RESULTS: Compared with the patients who received a Pipeline embolization device without platelet testing, those who underwent platelet testing and Pipeline embolization device placement experienced higher rates of intracranial hemorrhage (0 of 187 [0.0%] vs 12 of 511 [2.3%], respectively; P = .04), neurologic morbidity (4 of 187 [2.1%] vs 42 of 511 [8.2%], respectively; P < .01), and combined neurologic morbidity and mortality (6 of 187 [3.2%] vs 45 of 511 [8.8%], respectively; P = .01). More patients in the platelet testing and Pipeline embolization device group were treated with multiple devices (227 [38.0%] vs 56 [27.8] patients, respectively; P = .01). On multivariate analysis, the group of patients who underwent platelet testing and Pipeline embolization device placement had higher odds of neurologic morbidity (OR, 3.25 [95% CI, 1.10-9.61]; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Platelet testing in patients who undergo Pipeline embolization device placement is associated with higher rates of morbidity. Additional prospective studies are needed to determine if and when platelet testing in these patients is appropriate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brinjikji et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in Unruptured aneurysm (n=698). Platelet testing vs. No platelet testing was evaluated on Neurologic morbidity (OR 3.25, 95% CI 1.10-9.61, p=0.03). Platelet testing before Pipeline embolization device placement was associated with higher odds of neurologic morbidity compared to no testing (OR 3.25; 95% CI 1.10-9.61; P=0.03).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: