Why the study?
Platelet function testing has been proposed to personalize antiplatelet treatment during endovascular therapy for intracranial aneurysms, but its clinical significance required comprehensive evaluation.
Does a platelet function testing-guided antiplatelet strategy reduce thromboembolic events in patients undergoing endovascular treatment for intracranial aneurysms?
Does a platelet function testing-guided antiplatelet strategy reduce thromboembolic events in patients undergoing endovascular treatment for intracranial aneurysms?
Platelet function testing-guided antiplatelet therapy significantly reduces symptomatic thromboembolic events without increasing hemorrhagic risk in patients undergoing endovascular treatment for intracranial aneurysms.
May support platelet function testing-guided antiplatelet therapy in aneurysm embolization; extends observational meta-analysis but leaves open RCT confirmation.
BACKGROUND: Platelet function testing has been proposed to better adjust individualized antiplatelet treatment for patients undergoing endovascular treatment for intracranial aneurysms. Its clinical significance needs to be comprehensively evaluated. PURPOSE: Our aim was to evaluate the impact of platelet function testing–guided versus standard antiplatelet treatment in patients receiving endovascular treatment for intracranial aneurysms. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library of clinical trials were searched from inception until March 2023. STUDY SELECTION: Eleven studies comprising 6199 patients were included. DATA ANALYSIS: ORs with 95% CIs were calculated using random effects models. DATA SYNTHESIS: The platelet function testing–guided group was associated with a decreased rate of symptomatic thromboembolic events (OR = 0.57; 95% CI, 0.42–0.76; I² = 26%). No significant difference was found in asymptomatic thromboembolic events (OR = 1.07; 95% CI, 0.39–2.94; I² = 48%), hemorrhagic events (OR = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.42–1.19; I² = 34%), intracranial hemorrhagic events (OR = 0.61; 95% CI, 0.03–10.79; I² = 62%), morbidity (OR = 0.53; 95% CI, 0.05–5.72; I² = 86%), and mortality (OR = 1.96; 95% CI, 0.64–5.97; I² = 0%) between the 2 groups. Subgroup analysis suggested that platelet function testing–guided therapy may contribute to fewer symptomatic thromboembolic events in patients who received stent-assisted coiling (OR = 0.43; 95% CI, 0.18–1.02; I² = 43%) or a combination of stent-assisted and flow-diverter stent placement (OR = 0.61; 95% CI, 0.36–1.02; I² = 0%) or who changed from clopidogrel to other thienopyridines (OR = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.40–1.02; I² = 18%), though the difference did not reach statistical significance. LIMITATIONS: Heterogeneous endovascular treatment methods and adjusted antiplatelet regimens were limitations. CONCLUSIONS: Platelet function testing–guided antiplatelet strategy significantly reduced the incidence of symptomatic thromboembolic events without any increase in the hemorrhagic events for patients undergoing endovascular treatment for intracranial aneurysms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: