Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective review highlights need for public sites to prepare for treating at least 20 bleeding victims during attacks.
In response to increasing violent attacks, the Stop the Bleed campaign recommends that everyone have access to both personal and public bleeding-control kits. There are currently no guidelines about how many bleeding victims public sites should be equipped to treat during a mass casualty incident. We conducted a retrospective review of intentional mass casualty incidents, including shootings, stabbings, vehicle attacks, and bombings, to determine the typical number of people who might benefit from immediate hemorrhage control by a bystander before professional medical help arrives. On the basis of our analysis, we recommend that planners at public venues consider equipping their sites with supplies to treat a minimum of 20 bleeding victims during an intentional mass casualty incident.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goolsby et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: