PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 16, 2008Human Mutation165 citations

A large fraction of unclassified variants of the mismatch repair genesMLH1andMSH2is associated with splicing defects

View Full Paper
ITIsabelle TournierMVMyriam VézainAMAlexandra Martins

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Numerous unclassified variants (UVs) have been found in the mismatch repair genes MLH1 and MSH2 involved in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC or Lynch syndrome). Some of these variants may have an effect on pre-mRNA splicing, either by altering degenerate positions of splice site sequences or by affecting intronic or exonic splicing regulatory sequences such as exonic splicing enhancers (ESEs). In order to determine the consequences of UVs on splicing, we used a functional assay of exon inclusion. For each variant, mutant and wild-type exons to be tested were PCR-amplified from patient genomic DNA together with approximately 150 bp of flanking sequences and were inserted into a splicing reporter minigene. After transfection into HeLa cells, the effects on splicing were evaluated by RT-PCR analysis and systematic sequencing. A total of 22 UVs out of 85 different variant alleles examined in 82 families affected splicing, including four exonic variants that affected putative splicing regulatory elements. We analyzed short stretches spanning the latter variants by cloning them into the ESE-dependent central exon of a three-exon splicing minigene and we showed in cell transfection experiments that the wild-type sequences indeed contain functional ESEs. We then used this construct to query for ESE elements in the MLH1 or MSH2 regions affected by 14 previously reported exonic splicing mutations and showed that they also contain functional ESEs. These splicing assays represent a valuable tool for the interpretation of UVs and should contribute to the optimization of the molecular diagnosis of the Lynch syndrome and of other genetic diseases.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tournier et al. (2008) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a61bb03ce9bb37a6d7d8ad7https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.20796
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Information theory-based analysis of CYP2C19, CYP2D6 and CYP3A5 splicing mutations2003 · 66 citations
  2. 2Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer Families Not Complying with the Amsterdam Criteria Show Extremely Low Frequency of Mismatch-Repair-Gene Mutations1997 · 227 citations
  3. 3Disruption of an SF2/ASF-dependent exonic splicing enhancer in SMN2 causes spinal muscular atrophy in the absence of SMN12002 · 723 citations
  4. 4In silico and in vivo splicing analysis of MLH1 and MSH2 missense mutations shows exon- and tissue-specific effects2006 · 63 citations
  5. 5Disruption of an exon splicing enhancer in exon 3 of MLH1 is the cause of HNPCC in a Quebec family2005 · 29 citations