Key result
In patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension, orthostatic hypotension was associated with an increased risk of total death (HR 1.61; 95% CI 1.11-2.36) and heart failure events.
Why the study?
Does an intensive systolic BP target increase the incidence of orthostatic hypotension compared to a standard target, and does orthostatic hypotension predict adverse outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension?
Cohort (n=4,266)
Does an intensive systolic BP target increase the incidence of orthostatic hypotension compared to a standard target, and does orthostatic hypotension predict adverse outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension?
Hazard Ratio: 1.61 (95% CI 1.11–2.36)
In patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension, orthostatic hypotension is common and predicts increased mortality and heart failure events, but its incidence is not increased by intensive blood pressure control targets.
May warrant orthostatic hypotension screening in diabetic hypertension; leaves open causal impact on outcomes.
Orthostatic hypotension (OH) is associated with hypertension and diabetes mellitus. However, in populations with both hypertension and diabetes mellitus, its prevalence, the effect of intensive versus standard systolic blood pressure (BP) targets on incident OH, and its prognostic significance are unclear. In 4266 participants in the ACCORD (Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes) BP trial, seated BP was measured 3×, followed by readings every minute for 3 minutes after standing. Orthostatic BP change, calculated as the minimum standing minus the mean seated systolic BP and diastolic BP, was assessed at baseline, 12 months, and 48 months. The relationship between OH and clinical outcomes (total and cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, heart failure hospitalization or death and the primary composite outcome of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and cardiovascular death) was assessed using proportional hazards analysis. Consensus OH, defined by orthostatic decline in systolic BP ≥20 mm Hg or diastolic BP ≥10 mm Hg, occurred at ≥1 time point in 20% of participants. Neither age nor systolic BP treatment target (intensive, <120 mm Hg versus standard, <140 mm Hg) was related to OH incidence. Over a median follow-up of 46.9 months, OH was associated with increased risk of total death (hazard ratio, 1.61; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-2.36) and heart failure death/hospitalization (hazard ratio, 1.85, 95% confidence interval, 1.17-2.93), but not with the primary outcome or other prespecified outcomes. In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension, OH was common, not associated with intensive versus standard BP treatment goals, and predicted increased mortality and heart failure events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fleg et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension (n=4,266). Orthostatic hypotension vs. No orthostatic hypotension was evaluated on total death (HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.11-2.36). In patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension, orthostatic hypotension was associated with an increased risk of total death (HR 1.61; 95% CI 1.11-2.36) and heart failure events.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: