Key result
A set of 36 quality indicators for perioperative diabetes care was developed, yielding 21 valid indicators with good interobserver reliability for assessing hospital care quality.
A set of 21 valid and feasible quality indicators was developed to assess and improve perioperative diabetes care across the hospital care pathway.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
New perioperative diabetes quality indicators are measurable in practice; leaves open whether adoption improves outcomes.
BACKGROUND: In this study, we aim to develop a set of quality indicators for optimal perioperative diabetes care throughout the hospital care pathway and to gain insight into the feasibility of the indicator set in daily clinical practice by assessing the clinimetric properties of the indicators in a practice test. METHODS: A literature-based modified Delphi method was used to develop a set of quality indicators. To assess clinimetric properties of each indicator (measurability, applicability, reliability, improvement potential and case-mix stability), a practice test was performed in six Dutch hospitals using a sample of 389 major surgery patients with diabetes who underwent abdominal, cardiac or large joint orthopaedic surgery. RESULTS: We developed a set of 36 quality indicators for perioperative diabetes care. The practice test showed that one indicator was inapplicable, and nine indicators were unmeasurable. Interobserver reliability was good (0.61≤k≤0.8) for all indicators except for one with moderate (0.41≤k≤0.6) interobserver reliability. Improvement potential was low (<10%) for five indicators. Twenty-one indicators, including three outcome indicators, nine process indicators and nine structure indicators, could be used to assess the quality of care delivered in our six study hospitals. CONCLUSION: We developed a face and content valid set of quality indicators for optimal perioperative diabetes care throughout the hospital care pathway, using a rigorous and systematic approach. The results from our practice test show that it is essential to subject indicators to a practice test before applying them for quality improvement purposes. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01610674.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hommel et al. (2015) studied Diabetes in major surgery (n=389). Quality indicators for perioperative diabetes care was evaluated on Clinimetric properties of each indicator (measurability, applicability, reliability, improvement potential and case-mix stability). A set of 36 quality indicators for perioperative diabetes care was developed, yielding 21 valid indicators with good interobserver reliability for assessing hospital care quality.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: