Consensus on quality indicators for cardiovascular care across Europe is achievable for secondary prevention, but significant disagreement remains regarding primary prevention.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Facilitates standardized CVD prevention assessment across Europe; leaves open validation and outcome impact in routine care.
BACKGROUND: With free movement of labour in Europe, European guidelines on cardiovascular care and the enlargement of the European Union to include countries with disparate health care systems, it is important to develop common quality standards for cardiovascular prevention and risk management across Europe. METHODS: Panels from nine European countries (Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Netherlands, Slovenia, United Kingdom and Switzerland) developed quality indicators for the prevention and management of cardiovascular disease in primary care. A two-stage modified Delphi process was used to identify indicators that were judged valid for necessary care. RESULTS: Forty-four out of 202 indicators (22%) were rated as valid. These focused predominantly on secondary prevention and management of established cardiovascular disease and diabetes. Less agreement on indicators of preventive care or on indicators for the management of hypertension and hypercholesterolaemia in patients without established disease was observed. Although 85% of the 202 potential indicators assessed were rated valid by at least one panel, lack of consensus among panels meant that the set that could be agreed upon among all panels was much smaller. CONCLUSION: Indicators for the management of established cardiovascular disease have been developed, which can be used to measure the quality of cardiovascular care across a wide range of countries. Less agreement on how the quality of preventive care should be assessed was observed, probably caused by differences in health systems, culture and attitudes to prevention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Campbell et al. (2008) studied Cardiovascular disease. Modified Delphi process for quality indicators was evaluated on Indicators rated as valid for necessary care. A modified Delphi process across nine European countries identified 44 out of 202 proposed quality indicators as valid for the prevention and management of cardiovascular disease.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: