Key result
Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity was moderately correlated with four cardiovascular risk scores, with significantly stronger correlations observed in women (r = 0.649 for FRS) than in men (r = 0.451).
Why the study?
Does brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity correlate with traditional cardiovascular risk scores differently in men and women without cardiovascular disease?
Cross-Sectional (n=539)
No
Does brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity correlate with traditional cardiovascular risk scores differently in men and women without cardiovascular disease?
Effect estimate: r = 0.577
p-value: p=<0.001
Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity correlates moderately with traditional cardiovascular risk scores, with significantly stronger correlations observed in women compared to men.
baPWV may aid risk stratification in women; leaves open its added value beyond traditional scores in primary prevention.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) has been validated as a novel method to predict the cardiovascular risk in general population, the relevance of baPWV to the traditional risk scores has not been clearly revealed. This study investigated the relationship between baPWV and four different cardiovascular risk-predicting scores in men and women. METHODS: A total of 539 subjects (58.1 ± 12.2 years, 50.1% men) without cardiovascular disease (CVD) who underwent health examinations including baPWV measurement were retrospectively analyzed. Four cardiovascular risk scores (Framingham risk score [FRS; 1998], Adult Treatment Panel [ATP] III revised FRS [2002], generalized FRS [2008], and American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association [ACC/AHA] CVD risk [2013]) were calculated in each subject. RESULTS: In a total population, baPWV was moderately correlated with four cardiovascular risk scores (r = 0.577 for FRS; r = 0.594 for ATP III revised FRS; r = 0.589 for generalized FRS; r = 0.571 for ACC/AHA CVD risk; p < 0.001 for each). These correlations were stronger in women than in men (r = 0.649 vs. 0.451 for FRS; r = 0.719 vs. 0.411 for ATP III revised FRS; r = 0.735 vs. 0.540 for generalized FRS; r = 0.699 vs. 0.552 for ACC/AHA CVD risk; p for gender difference ≤ 0.005 for each). CONCLUSION: In middle-aged and elderly Koreans without CVD, baPWV was identified as having a moderately positive correlation with four different risk scores. The correlation was stronger in women than in men, implying the better performance of baPWV in women for predicting cardiovascular risk of healthy population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rhee et al. (2018) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy adults without cardiovascular disease (n=539). Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) was evaluated on Correlation between baPWV and Framingham risk score (1998) (r = 0.577, p=<0.001). Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity was moderately correlated with four cardiovascular risk scores, with significantly stronger correlations observed in women (r = 0.649 for FRS) than in men (r = 0.451).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: