Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVES: To compare radiography and ultrasound for the assessment of the tympanic bulla against computed tomography results. METHODS: Thirty-one dogs had dorsoventral, left and right lateral oblique and rostrocaudal open mouth radiographs compared with ultrasound images and computed tomography scans of the tympanic bullae. RESULTS: Radiography was superior to ultrasonography for the evaluation of the middle ear. However, computed tomography assessment was best predicted by a combination of radiographic and ultrasonographic findings. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: A combination of radiography and ultrasound can provide a more accurate assessment of the bulla than either of them alone. Ultrasound may have a role in the evaluation of middle ear disease in the dog. Results are operator dependent and not reproducible with current recording techniques.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Doust et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: