PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2002Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research175 citations

Semantic Representation and Naming in Young Children

View Full Paper
KMKarla K. McGregorRFRena M. FriedmanRRRenée M. Reilly

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Children's semantic representations and semantic naming errors were the focus of this study. In Experiment 1, 25 normally developing children (mean age = 5 years 4 months) named, drew, and defined 20 age-appropriate objects. The results suggested that functional and physical properties are core aspects of object representations in the semantic lexicon and that these representations are often organized and accessed according to a taxonomic hierarchy. Results of a new procedure, comparative picture naming/picture drawing, suggested that the degree of knowledge in the semantic lexicon makes words more or less vulnerable to retrieval failure. Most semantic naming errors were associated with limited semantic knowledge, manifested as either lexical gaps or fragile representations. Comparison of definitions for correctly named and semantically misnamed objects provided converging evidence for this conclusion. In Experiment 2, involving 16 normally developing children (mean age = 5 years 5 months), the comparative picture naming/picture drawing results were replicated with a stimulus set that allowed a priori matching of the visual complexity of items drawn from correct and semantic error pools. Discussion focuses on the dynamic nature of semantic representations and the relation between semantic representation and naming during a period of slow mapping. The value of comparative picture naming/picture drawing as a new method for exploring children's semantic representations is emphasized.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

McGregor et al. (2002) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a61fefb0579a17fd4c9357fhttps://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2002/026)
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Development of Word Definition in Children1969 · 46 citations
  2. 2The emergent lexicon : The child's development of a linguistic vocabulary. Ed. by Michael D. Smith and John L. Locke (Developmental psychology series.) San Diego: Academic Press, 1988. Pp. xxii, 358. $39.95.1990 · 169 citations
  3. 3Twenty-five-month-old children do not have a grammatical category of verb1993 · 152 citations
  4. 4The Construct of Resilience: A Critical Evaluation and Guidelines for Future Work2000 · 9,339 citations
  5. 5Systems of representation in children: Development and use1993 · 82 citations