Key result
Current clinical evidence supports isolated coronary artery bypass grafting as first-line therapy for moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation, as concomitant mitral valve repair shows no short-term survival benefit.
Why the study?
Does concomitant mitral valve repair in addition to CABG improve outcomes compared to CABG alone in patients with moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation?
Does concomitant mitral valve repair in addition to CABG improve outcomes compared to CABG alone in patients with moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review summarizes the available evidence, including the CTSN randomized trial, regarding the optimal surgical management of moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation during CABG.
Ischemic mitral regurgitation (MR) is a common occurrence following myocardial infarction and its presence is associated with poor outcomes. The optimal treatment of ischemic MR is a matter of debate, especially for patients with moderate MR severity. Some authors advocate for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for patients with moderate MR, maintaining that reverse ventricular remodeling will reduce MR grade and its associated mortality risk, while others argue that a concomitant mitral valve repair (MVR) or replacement is superior. The Cardiothoracic Surgical Trials Network (CTSN) recently published the 1-year results of the Surgical Treatment of Moderate Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation study, a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial investigating the impact of MVR in addition to CABG compared to CABG alone in the treatment of moderate ischemic MR. Here, we have reviewed previous observational and prospective studies investigating moderate ischemic MR treatment as well as the results of the current CTSN randomized trial. Furthermore, we have summarized the current state of the available evidence and preview potential new information that will become available with planned subgroup analyses and further follow-up of enrolled patients in the recently completed CTSN trial.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gulack et al. (2015) conducted a review in Moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation. Concomitant mitral valve repair and coronary artery bypass grafting vs. Isolated coronary artery bypass grafting was evaluated. Current clinical evidence supports isolated coronary artery bypass grafting as first-line therapy for moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation, as concomitant mitral valve repair shows no short-term survival benefit.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: