Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVES: To analyse the immunogenicity and safety of inactivated subunit quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV) versus trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV) in children and adolescents 3-17 years of age. METHODS: In this phase III, multicentre, double-blind study, 1200 subjects were randomized to receive QIV (n=402), TIV with the B-strain of the Victoria lineage (n=404), or TIV with the B-strain of the Yamagata lineage (n=394). The primary objective was to demonstrate non-inferiority of QIV to TIV for immunogenicity against shared influenza strains, based on post-vaccination hemagglutinin inhibition (HI) titres. Secondary objectives were to show superiority of QIV to TIV for immunogenicity against alternate-lineage B-strains, and to further characterize the immune response by analysing virus neutralization and neuraminidase inhibition titres. Reactogenicity and safety were also compared post-vaccination. RESULTS: QIV elicited a non-inferior response for shared strains (upper limits of the 95% confidence intervals for the HI geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of TIV/QIV<1.5) and a superior response for alternate-lineage B-strains (HI GMRs of TIV/QIV<1.0; p<0.0001) versus TIV. Reporting rates of local and systemic adverse reactions were similar between vaccine arms. CONCLUSIONS: QIV had comparable immunogenicity to TIV for shared strains and superior immunogenicity to the alternate-lineage B-strains in TIV. Safety and tolerability profiles were comparable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vesikari et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: