Key result
The structural complexity of physical activity barcodes decreased with higher pain intensity, and a composite statistical score effectively discriminated between severe pain and no pain in middle-aged subjects (AUC 0.9).
Why the study?
Does physical activity 'barcoding' objectively assess the intensity of chronic pain in patients compared to healthy subjects?
Observational (n=75)
No
Does physical activity 'barcoding' objectively assess the intensity of chronic pain in patients compared to healthy subjects?
Comprehensive analysis of daily-life physical activity using 'barcoding' can provide an objective appraisal of chronic pain intensity.
May aid noninvasive pain assessment in middle age; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
BACKGROUND: Modern theories define chronic pain as a multidimensional experience - the result of complex interplay between physiological and psychological factors with significant impact on patients' physical, emotional and social functioning. The development of reliable assessment tools capable of capturing the multidimensional impact of chronic pain has challenged the medical community for decades. A number of validated tools are currently used in clinical practice however they all rely on self-reporting and are therefore inherently subjective. In this study we show that a comprehensive analysis of physical activity (PA) under real life conditions may capture behavioral aspects that may reflect physical and emotional functioning. METHODOLOGY: PA was monitored during five consecutive days in 60 chronic pain patients and 15 pain-free healthy subjects. To analyze the various aspects of pain-related activity behaviors we defined the concept of PA 'barcoding'. The main idea was to combine different features of PA (type, intensity, duration) to define various PA states. The temporal sequence of different states was visualized as a 'barcode' which indicated that significant information about daily activity can be contained in the amount and variety of PA states, and in the temporal structure of sequence. This information was quantified using complementary measures such as structural complexity metrics (information and sample entropy, Lempel-Ziv complexity), time spent in PA states, and two composite scores, which integrate all measures. The reliability of these measures to characterize chronic pain conditions was assessed by comparing groups of subjects with clinically different pain intensity. CONCLUSION: The defined measures of PA showed good discriminative features. The results suggest that significant information about pain-related functional limitations is captured by the structural complexity of PA barcodes, which decreases when the intensity of pain increases. We conclude that a comprehensive analysis of daily-life PA can provide an objective appraisal of the intensity of pain.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paraschiv-Ionescu et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Chronic pain (n=75). Chronic pain vs. Pain-free healthy subjects or lower pain intensity was evaluated on Structural complexity of physical activity barcodes (composite statistical score). The structural complexity of physical activity barcodes decreased with higher pain intensity, and a composite statistical score effectively discriminated between severe pain and no pain in middle-aged subjects (AUC 0.9).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: