Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The objective was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NMV/r) in treating adults with COVID-19 at high-risk of developing severe COVID-19 who do not require supplemental oxygen, compared to no treatment, from the Spanish National Health System (NHS) perspective. A decision-tree for the first year followed by a two-state Markov model with annual cycles for a lifetime horizon was developed. A cohort of 1000 high-risk, symptomatic COVID-19 patients entered the decision-tree for each comparator, divided into hospitalized patients, considering their level of care, and outpatients, for whom only symptom duration was considered. Vaccination status of patients and COVID-19-specific mortality for hospitalized patients were considered. NMV/r efficacy in reducing hospitalizations, deaths and symptom days was applied. Patient quality of life and costs were included (€2024). All the parameters and assumptions were validated by experts. The model reported outputs including costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and cost per QALY gained. NMV/r was dominant compared to no treatment, with a decrease in cost per patient of €169.69 and an increase in QALYs of 0.05. NMV/r is a dominant option compared to no treatment in high-risk adult patients with symptomatic COVID-19 not requiring supplemental oxygen, from the Spanish NHS perspective.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Perea et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: