Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We present a first-principles calculation of two second-order optical response functions as well as the dielectric function for GaAs and GaP. Specifically, we evaluate the dielectric function {ε}({ω}) and the second-harmonic generation response coefficient χ⁽²⁾(-2{ω};{ω},{ω}) over a large frequency range. The electronic linear electro-optic susceptibility χ⁽²⁾(-{ω};{ω},0) is also evaluated below the band gap. These results are based on a series of self-consistent LDA calculations using the full-potential linearized augmented plane wave method. Self-energy corrections are included at the level of the ``scissors'' approximation, which corrects for the underestimation of the local density approximation band gap and produces a change in the velocity matrix elements. The analytic expressions for the second-order response functions are free of the unphysically divergent terms at zero frequency that have previously plagued such calculations. Results for χ⁽²⁾(-{ω};{ω},0) are in good agreement with experiment below the band gap and those for χ⁽²⁾(-2{ω};{ω},{ω}) are compared with experimental data where available. We note that despite the equivalence of both of these second-order response functions at zero frequency, there seems to be some discrepancy between the experimental results for these functions in this regime. {} 1996 The American Physical Society.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hughes et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: