Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Surveys are essential tools in environmental social science for understanding environmental challenges, human-nature relationships, resource use, attitudes, and behaviors. While academic and community-based research partnerships can boost research legitimacy and foster equitable knowledge exchange, there is limited guidance for co-developing surveys that align with community needs and priorities. Drawing on case studies from Belau (Palau), Maui, and Mauritius, we present four strategies for ethical and effective community-based survey co-development: (1) Establishing Reciprocal Partnerships, (2) Designing Culturally Responsive Surveys, (3) Fostering Ethical Fieldwork, and (4) Strengthening Environmental Networks. These strategies address challenges and opportunities across the research process, from the difficulties of balancing diverse objectives and navigating power dynamics to the benefits of integrating cultural concepts and creating pathways for environmental leadership. By centering relationship building and local knowledge systems, these strategies provide actionable guidance for academic and community-based researchers conducting collaborative research, supporting more equitable, relevant, and impactful conservation outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santana et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: