Key result
Resistance training combined with aerobic training had no additional effect beyond aerobic training alone on fasting glucose metabolism, blood lipids, and body composition in patients with coronary artery disease.
Why the study?
The effect of resistance training in cardiac rehabilitation on insulin resistance remains elusive.
Does adding resistance training to aerobic training improve insulin resistance, lipids, and body composition in patients with coronary artery disease?
RCT (n=79)
Open-label
Cluster randomized
No
Does adding resistance training to aerobic training improve insulin resistance, lipids, and body composition in patients with coronary artery disease?
p-value: p=0.880
Adding resistance training to aerobic training in cardiac rehabilitation does not provide additional benefits for insulin resistance, lipid profiles, or body composition in patients with coronary artery disease.
Adding RT to AT yields no extra benefit on insulin resistance or lipids in CAD patients; reinforces AT alone as sufficient in cardiac rehabilitation.
BACKGROUND: The effect of resistance training (RT) in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) on insulin resistance remains elusive. We examined whether the addition of high-load (HL) or low loads (LL) RT has any effect on the levels of insulin resistance and lipids versus aerobic training (AT) alone in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: Seventy-nine CAD patients were randomised to HL-RT [70-80% of one repetition maximum (1-RM)] and AT, LL-RT (35-40% of 1-RM) and AT or AT (50-80% of maximal power output), and 59 patients [75% males, 15% diabetics, age: 61 (8) years, left ventricular ejection fraction: 53 (9) %] completed the study. Plasma levels of glucose, insulin, blood lipids [total cholesterol, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)] cholesterol and body composition were measured at baseline and post-training (36 training sessions). RESULTS: Training intervention had only time effect on lean mass (p = 0.002), total and LDL cholesterol levels (both p < 0.001), and no effects on levels of glucose and insulin resistance (homeostatic assessment 2-insulin resistance). Total and LDL cholesterols levels decreased following AT [mean difference (95% confidence interval); total cholesterol: - 0.4 mmol/l (- 0.7 mmol/l, - 0.1 mmol/l), p = 0.013; LDL: - 0.4 mmol/l (- 0.7 mmol/l, - 0.1 mmol/l), p = 0.006] and HL-RT [total cholesterol: - 0.5 mmol/l (- 0.8 mmol/l, - 0.2 mmol/l), p = 0.002; LDL: - 0.5 mol/l (- 0.7 mmol/l, - 0.2 mmol/l), p = 0.002]. No associations were observed between post-training change in body composition and post-training change in blood biomarkers. CONCLUSIONS: RT when combined with AT had no additional effect beyond AT alone on fasting glucose metabolism, blood lipids and body composition in patients with CAD. Trial registration number NCT04638764.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kambič et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Coronary artery disease (n=79). High-load or low-load resistance training combined with aerobic training vs. Aerobic training alone was evaluated on Between-group difference in insulin resistance (HOMA2-IR) (p=0.880). Resistance training combined with aerobic training had no additional effect beyond aerobic training alone on fasting glucose metabolism, blood lipids, and body composition in patients with coronary artery disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: