Key result
Circuit resistance training reduces BMI and body fat significantly more than aerobic training in CHD.
Why the study?
The rehabilitation effect of circuit resistance training in patients with coronary heart disease remained unclear.
Does circuit resistance training improve body mass index and body fat percentage in patients with coronary heart disease compared to aerobic training?
Meta-Analysis
Does circuit resistance training improve body mass index and body fat percentage in patients with coronary heart disease compared to aerobic training?
Circuit resistance training is an effective alternative to traditional aerobic training for cardiac rehabilitation, offering advantages in reducing BMI and body fat percentage at potentially lower exercise loads.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Circuit resistance training may improve body composition over aerobic training in CHD rehab; extends RCT meta-analysis support for resistance-inclusive protocols.
BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: The rehabilitation effect of circuit resistance training in coronary heart disease (CHD) patients remains unclear. We perform this review to examine the rehabilitation effect of circuit resistance training in CHD patients and to provide a basis for the formulation of reasonable individual exercise prescriptions for CHD patients. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were searched on PubMed, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, Embase, Clinical Trials, and CNKI. About 1232 studies were identified. Nine RCTs were finally used for the present meta-analysis to determine the rehabilitation effect of circuit resistance training in CHD patients, compared to aerobic training. Individuals enrolled for the studies were at a mean age of 60.5 years old and were all CHD patients. Following the PRISMA guidelines, we extracted basic information about the study and patient characteristics, as well as measurements (e.g., the peak oxygen uptake, the body mass index [BMI], the body fat percentage, the systolic blood pressure, the total cholesterol, and triglycerides). Subsequently, this meta-analysis determined the overall effect by using standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Compared with aerobic training, circuit resistance training significantly decrease the BMI and the body fat percentage. CONCLUSIONS: As suggested from the present meta-analysis of RCTs, circuit resistance training is effective in improving the BMI and the body fat percentage in CHD patients and may help delay the progression of CHD. CRT has the advantage of lower load in most cases with a similar effect.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2022) conducted a meta-analysis in Coronary heart disease. Circuit resistance training vs. Aerobic training was evaluated on Body mass index (BMI) (SMD -1.07, 95% CI -1.88 to -0.27, p=0.009). Circuit resistance training decreased body mass index and body fat percentage compared to aerobic training in patients with coronary heart disease.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: