Key result
In CAD patients, 12 weeks of aerobic exercise training did not alter cellular markers of endothelial integrity, though baseline EMPs inversely correlated with FMD improvement (rho = -0.374, P=0.001).
Why the study?
Does aerobic interval training compared to continuous training improve cellular markers of endothelial integrity and endothelial function in patients with stable coronary artery disease?
Population
200 stable coronary artery disease patients with left ventricular ejection fraction > 40%, mean age 58.4 ±…
Comparison
Supervised 12-week rehabilitation program of… vs Supervised 12-week rehabilitation program of…
Design
RCT, 1:1 base
Follow-up
12 weeks
Authors
Loading...
Aerobic exercise does not alter endothelial markers in CAD; baseline EMP-FMD correlation is hypothesis-generating and requires confirmation.
RCT (n=200)
1:1
Yes
Does aerobic interval training compared to continuous training improve cellular markers of endothelial integrity and endothelial function in patients with stable coronary artery disease?
In patients with stable CAD, improvements in endothelial function following exercise training are not mediated by changes in circulating endothelial progenitor cells or angiogenic T cells.
Craenenbroeck et al. (2015) conducted an RCT in Stable coronary artery disease (n=200). Aerobic interval training vs. Aerobic continuous training was evaluated on Cellular markers of endothelial integrity (EPCs, angiogenic T cells, and EMPs). In CAD patients, 12 weeks of aerobic exercise training did not alter cellular markers of endothelial integrity, though baseline EMPs inversely correlated with FMD improvement (rho = -0.374, P=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: