Key result
CFAE sites in canine AF models exhibited significantly thicker atrial myocardium (p=0.036) and a larger amount of fibrotic tissue (22.8% vs 7.2%, p<0.001) compared to matched non-CFAE sites.
Why the study?
Do complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE) sites exhibit different histopathologic characteristics compared to non-CFAE sites in a canine AF model?
Do complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE) sites exhibit different histopathologic characteristics compared to non-CFAE sites in a canine AF model?
Absolute Event Rate: 22.8% vs 7.2%
p-value: p=<0.001
In a canine AF model, CFAE sites are structurally characterized by increased myocardial thickness and greater fibrosis compared to adjacent non-CFAE sites, providing insight into the electrophysiological substrate of atrial fibrillation.
Structural differences at CFAE sites in canine AF models; leaves open relevance for human substrate ablation.
Background and Objectives: Although ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) in atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the strategies for atrial substrate modification, the mechanism behind CFAE as an electrophysiological substrate remains unclear. We investigated structural differences between CFAE sites and their matched non-CFAE sites by comparing their histopathologic characteristics in canine AF models. Methods: Atrial electrograms of four dogs were obtained from the epicardial site. AF was induced through burst atrial pacing at 600 bpm for 30 min. CFAE sites were identified during AF according to patterns visualized on the electrograms, and their matched non-CFAE sites were selected in the adjacent region, within 5 mm of each CFAE site. Tissues were harvested from CFAE sites and their matched non-CFAE sites at various locations in both atria. Histopathologic differences were identified between CFAE and non-CFAE sites. Results: A total of 24 atrial tissues (12 with CFAE, 12 with non-CFAE) were evaluated. The atrial myocardium was significantly thicker at CFAE sites (1757.5560.5 m) than at non-CFAE sites (1279.5337.2 m) (p=0.036). At CFAE sites, it was filled with a significantly larger amount of fibrotic tissue than at non-CFAE sites (22.86.9% versus 7.24.7%, p<0.001). Results were consistent across various tissue locations. The distribution of autonomic nerve innervation was similar between CFAE and non-CFAE sites.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rhee et al. (2018) studied Atrial fibrillation (n=4). Complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) sites vs. Matched non-CFAE sites was evaluated on Amount of fibrotic tissue (p=<0.001). CFAE sites in canine AF models exhibited significantly thicker atrial myocardium (p=0.036) and a larger amount of fibrotic tissue (22.8% vs 7.2%, p<0.001) compared to matched non-CFAE sites.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: