Key result
Urine albumin to creatinine ratio ≥ 300 mg/g was significantly associated with incident diabetic retinopathy (HR 1.485; 95% CI 1.103-1.548; p<0.001), showing a stronger association than eGFR < 60.
Why the study?
Does UACR or eGFR better predict the incidence of diabetic retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Cohort
Does UACR or eGFR better predict the incidence of diabetic retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Hazard Ratio: 1.485 (95% CI 1.103–1.548)
p-value: p=<0.001
UACR has a stronger association with the development of diabetic retinopathy than eGFR in patients with type 2 diabetes, although both are important risk factors.
Supports integrated screening for complications in T2DM; extends observational links but leaves open causal effects and interventions.
Aims. To determine the relationship between diabetic nephropathy and diabetic retinopathy on a population of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Methods. A prospective ten-year follow-up population-based study. We determined differences between estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration equation and urine albumin to creatinine ratio. Results. Annual incidence of any-DR was 8.21 ± 0.60% (7.06%–8.92%), sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy (STDR) was 2.65 ± 0.14% (2.48%–2.88%), and diabetic macular edema (DME) was 2.21 ± 0.18% (2%–2.49%). Renal study results were as follows: UACR > 30 mg/g had an annual incidence of 7.02 ± 0.05% (6.97%–7.09%), eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m 2 incidence was 5.89 ± 0.12% (5.70%–6.13%). Cox’s proportional regression analysis of DR incidence shows that renal function studied by eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m 2 was less significant (p=0.04, HR 1.223, 1.098–1.201) than UACR ≥ 300 mg/g (p<0.001, HR 1.485, 1.103–1.548). The study of STDR shows that eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m 2 was significant (p=0.02, HR 1.890, 1.267–2.820), UACR ≥ 300 mg/g (p<0.001, HR 2.448, 1.595–3.757), and DME shows that eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m 2 was significant (p=0.02, HR 1.920, 1.287–2.864) and UACR ≥ 300 mg/g (p<0.001, HR 2.432, 1.584–3.732). Conclusions. The UACR has a better association with diabetic retinopathy than the eGFR, although both are important risk factors for diabetic retinopathy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Romero‐Aroca et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Urine albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR) ≥ 300 mg/g vs. Lower UACR was evaluated on Diabetic retinopathy (DR) incidence (HR 1.485, 95% CI 1.103-1.548, p=<0.001). Urine albumin to creatinine ratio ≥ 300 mg/g was significantly associated with incident diabetic retinopathy (HR 1.485; 95% CI 1.103-1.548; p<0.001), showing a stronger association than eGFR < 60.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: