Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trial compares intraocular pressure reduction in glaucoma patients receiving bevacizumab alone or with methylcellulose, suggesting improved outcomes with the mixture.
Introduction: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of bevacizumab administered alone versus combined with methylcellulose in reducing intraocular pressure during a six-month period following deep sclerectomy. Methods: This comparative investigation, serving as an extension of a prospective randomized controlled trial, enrolled 30 eyes from 30 individuals diagnosed with open-angle glaucoma (15 eyes assigned to each treatment arm). Among participants, 33.3% presented with secondary open-angle glaucoma (pseudoexfoliation syndrome), while 66.7% had primary open-angle glaucoma requiring deep sclerectomy. Postoperatively, Group A received subconjunctival bevacizumab injections, whereas Group B received subconjunctival injections of a bevacizumab-methylcellulose mixture. Primary outcome measures included surgical success rates and bleb morphology assessment. Results: Among eligible participants, 66.7% were male and 33.3% were female. Visual acuity measurements demonstrated no significant intergroup differences before or after surgery. Although Group B exhibited greater IOP reduction compared to Group A, statistically significant differences between groups emerged only at postoperative day one and at the six-month follow-up assessment. Success rates (complete or relative success) at six months showed no statistically significant variation between groups (*P*>0.05), nor did mean preoperative and postoperative values with standard deviations differ significantly. Vascularity scores decreased markedly in Group B at one-month, three-month, and six-month evaluations relative to Group A. Conclusion: Utilizing a sustained-release delivery system that extends bevacizumab bioavailability appears to enhance surgical outcomes compared to conventional isolated bevacizumab ocular injections.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mostafaie et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: