Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
August 4, 2009Critical CareOpen Access

Landmark survival as an end-point for trials in critically ill patients – comparison of alternative durations of follow-up: an exploratory analysis

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

GTGopal TaoriAustin HospitalKHKwok M. HoSt John of God Subiaco HospitalCGCarol GeorgeKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Taori et al. (2009) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a626485ce9bb37a6d7dc7cfhttps://doi.org/10.1186/cc7988
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Comparison of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score with organ failure scores to predict hospital mortality2007 · 92 citations
  2. 2Septic Shock — Vasopressin, Norepinephrine, and Urgency2008 · 60 citations
  3. 3Estimating Long-Term Survival of Critically Ill Patients: The PREDICT Model2008 · 114 citations
  4. 4Pulmonary-Artery versus Central Venous Catheter to Guide Treatment of Acute Lung Injury2006 · 991 citations
  5. 5APACHE II1985 · 13,870 citations