Key result
Proton-pump inhibitor use in non-cardiac chest pain patients increased the risk of developing ischemic heart disease compared to no therapy (OR 1.14; 95% CI 1.03-1.25; P=0.0093).
Why the study?
Reports of cardiac-related adverse events with chronic proton-pump inhibitor treatment raised concerns about altered natural history in patients with non-cardiac chest pain.
Does proton-pump inhibitor use increase the risk of developing ischemic heart disease in patients with non-cardiac chest pain?
Cohort
Does proton-pump inhibitor use increase the risk of developing ischemic heart disease in patients with non-cardiac chest pain?
Odds Ratio: 1.14 (95% CI 1.03–1.25)
Number Needed to Treat: 17
p-value: p=.0093
PPI use in non-cardiac chest pain patients is associated with a statistically significant but clinically marginal increased risk of developing ischemic heart disease.
BACKGROUND: The growing reports regarding cardiac-related adverse events of chronic proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) treatment, a mainstay therapy of non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP), have raised concerns about alteration of the natural course in NCCP patients using PPI. We aimed to determine if NCCP patients receiving PPI have a higher risk of developing ischemic heart disease (IHD) compared to those not receiving PPI therapy. METHODS: Three groups of NCCP patients were included; PPI, histamine-2 receptor antagonist (H2RA), and no antireflux treatment. Diagnosis of NCCP had to precede diagnosis of IHD by at least 30 days, and in those receiving antireflux treatment at 30 days after starting the medication. Data analysis was corrected for 6 known confounding factors for IHD including hyperlipidemia, hypertension, obesity, smoking status, male gender, and diabetes mellitus. KEY RESULTS: Of the patients on PPI or H2RA, 1280 and 250, respectively, developed IHD. Patients on PPI therapy displayed an increased odd of developing ischemic heart disease compared to patients never placed on therapy (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.03-1.25, P-value .0093). Patients placed on H2RA therapy did not show a statistically significant change in risk compared to patients who were not placed on therapy (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.77-1.06, P-value .2049). Number needed to harm in the PPI and H2RA groups was 17 and 45, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PPIs confer a statistically significant, but marginal effect on the risk of IHD development in NCCP patients. Thus, PPI use in NCCP only minimally alters the overall benign natural course of the disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP). Proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) vs. No antireflux treatment was evaluated on Development of ischemic heart disease (IHD) (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.03-1.25, p=.0093). Proton-pump inhibitor use in non-cardiac chest pain patients increased the risk of developing ischemic heart disease compared to no therapy (OR 1.14; 95% CI 1.03-1.25; P=0.0093).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: