Key result
The use of antithrombotics after hemorrhagic infarction was associated with a significantly lower rate of composite events at 1 month compared to no antithrombotics (1.6% vs 11.1%, OR 0.132).
Why the study?
Does the use of antithrombotics after hemorrhagic infarction in acute ischemic stroke increase the risk of hemorrhagic transformation aggravation or neurological deterioration?
Observational (n=222)
No
Does the use of antithrombotics after hemorrhagic infarction in acute ischemic stroke increase the risk of hemorrhagic transformation aggravation or neurological deterioration?
Odds Ratio: 0.132 (95% CI 0.02–0.893)
Absolute Event Rate: 1.6% vs 11.1%
p-value: p=0.038
Antithrombotic therapy can be safely used after hemorrhagic infarction in acute ischemic stroke without significantly increasing the risk of hematoma aggravation or neurological deterioration, while potentially reducing 1-month composite vascular events.
Supports antithrombotic use after hemorrhagic infarction to lower early events; challenges consensus on avoidance in this setting.
BACKGROUNDS: There have been neither appropriate guidelines nor clinical studies about the use of antithrombotics after hemorrhagic transformation (HT). We sought to find whether the use of antithrombotics after hemorrhagic infarction might be associated with aggravation of HT and neurological deterioration. METHODS: This retrospective study included prospectively registered consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke and HT in our tertiary stroke center. We focused on the hemorrhagic infarction. Aggravation of HT was defined as either enlargement of the original HT or newly developed HT within the infarcted area by visual analysis. We analyzed relationships between antithrombotics and HT, and neurological deterioration after HT in patients with hemorrhagic infarction. In addition, we assessed composite outcomes including neurological deterioration, vascular events, and death at 1 month after HT. We analyzed relationships between antithrombotics after discharge and composite outcomes within 1 month after HT. RESULTS: 222 patients were finally analyzed. Of the 150 patients with hemorrhagic infarction, 75 (50.0%) were type 1. The use of warfarin after detection of hemorrhagic infarction more frequently increased aggravation of HT than did the use of antiplatelets (4 of 24 vs 3 of 69; p = 0.094), but neither warfarin nor antiplatelets caused more HT than no medication. In addition, the use of antithrombotics after hemorrhagic infarction was not significantly associated with neurological deterioration after HT. The frequency of composite events at 1 months was significantly lower in patients treated with antithrombotics than those treated without (p = 0.041). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that antithrombotics can safely be used after hemorrhagic infarction and may not be associated with neurological deterioration and aggravation of HT. Further studies are needed to confirm our results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Acute ischemic stroke with hemorrhagic transformation (n=222). Antithrombotics vs. No antithrombotics was evaluated on Composite events (neurological deterioration, vascular events, and death) at 1 month (OR 0.132, 95% CI 0.020-0.893, p=0.038). The use of antithrombotics after hemorrhagic infarction was associated with a significantly lower rate of composite events at 1 month compared to no antithrombotics (1.6% vs 11.1%, OR 0.132).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: