Australians underestimate social compliance with coronavirus restrictions: findings from a national survey

OBJECTIVE: We assessed differences between Australians' perceptions of their own compliance with coronavirus restrictions and their perceptions of community compliance. METHODS: We surveyed a national quota sample of 1,691 Australians in August and September 2020. Participants reported their level of compliance with coronavirus restrictions and estimated compliance from others in their state/territory. RESULTS: Overwhelmingly, most people reported complying with restrictions. They believed their fellow community members were much less compliant. Age and other demographics were only weakly associated with self-reported compliance and perceptions of others' compliance. CONCLUSIONS: The results are consistent with prevalent cognitive biases, including the tendency to believe one is better-than-average, and to more easily recall instances of deviances from social norms. IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH: We recommend public health messaging avoids amplifying instances of social transgressions of coronavirus restrictions. Instead, the widespread nature of social compliance with restrictions across the country should be emphasised.