Why the study?
Cardiovascular health is a key determinant of overall outcomes after cancer, but whether a systemic multi-biomarker approach can overcome elusive cardiovascular tissue diagnoses and be personalized in clinical practice remains an open question.
How can cardiovascular biomarkers be utilized to stratify risk, monitor health, and detect damage in cancer survivors?
How can cardiovascular biomarkers be utilized to stratify risk, monitor health, and detect damage in cancer survivors?
This AHA scientific statement provides a comprehensive overview of the current state and future directions of cardiovascular biomarker utilization in cardio-oncology.
Biomarker use in cancer survivors should not yet guide care; leaves open discovery and validation for risk stratification and monitoring.
Improving cancer survival represents the most significant effect of precision medicine and personalized molecular and immunologic therapeutics. Cardiovascular health becomes henceforth a key determinant for the direction of overall outcomes after cancer. Comprehensive tissue diagnostic studies undoubtedly have been and continue to be at the core of the fight against cancer. Will a systemic approach integrating circulating blood-derived biomarkers, multimodality imaging technologies, strategic panomics, and real-time streams of digitized physiological data overcome the elusive cardiovascular tissue diagnosis in cardio-oncology? How can such a systemic approach be personalized for application in day-to-day clinical work, with diverse patient populations, cancer diagnoses, and therapies? To address such questions, this scientific statement approaches a broad definition of the biomarker concept. It summarizes the current literature on the utilization of a multitude of established cardiovascular biomarkers at the intersection with cancer. It identifies limitations and gaps of knowledge in the application of biomarkers to stratify the cardiovascular risk before cancer treatment, monitor cardiovascular health during cancer therapy, and detect latent cardiovascular damage in cancer survivors. Last, it highlights areas in biomarker discovery, validation, and clinical application for concerted efforts from funding agencies, scientists, and clinicians at the cardio-oncology nexus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zaha et al. (2021) conducted a review in Cancer survivors. Cardiovascular biomarkers was evaluated. Cardiovascular biomarker utilization in cancer survivors requires further discovery and validation to stratify risk, monitor health, and detect latent cardiovascular damage.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: