Key result
Prior S-nitrosylation of CaMKIIδ at Cys-273 by NO donors limits subsequent β-adrenergic induced arrhythmias, whereas S-nitrosylation at Cys-290 worsens or sustains them.
Why the study?
Although NO donors are routinely used clinically, it is unknown how they modulate pro-arrhythmic CaMKII to alter cardiac arrhythmia incidence during β-adrenergic stimulation.
Does S-nitrosylation of CaMKIIδ by NO donors modulate β-adrenergic-induced spontaneous Ca2+ release and ventricular arrhythmias in murine models?
Does S-nitrosylation of CaMKIIδ by NO donors modulate β-adrenergic-induced spontaneous Ca2+ release and ventricular arrhythmias in murine models?
Prior S-nitrosylation of CaMKIIδ at Cys-273 limits β-adrenergic-induced arrhythmias, but S-nitrosylation at Cys-290 may worsen them, highlighting complex timing-dependent effects of NO donors.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Timing of NO donation may influence arrhythmia susceptibility via CaMKII; hypothesis-generating in mice, human relevance remains open.
Rationale Nitric oxide (NO) has been identified as a signalling molecule generated during β-adrenergic receptor (AR) stimulation in the heart. Furthermore, a role for NO in triggering spontaneous Ca 2+ release via S -nitrosylation of Ca 2+ /calmodulin kinase II delta (CaMKIIδ) is emerging. NO donors are routinely used clinically for their cardioprotective effects in the heart, but it is unknown how NO donors modulate the pro-arrhythmic CaMKII to alter cardiac arrhythmia incidence. Objective We test the role of S -nitrosylation of CaMKIIδ at the Cys-273 inhibitory site and Cys-290 activating site in cardiac Ca 2+ handling and arrhythmogenesis before and during β-AR stimulation. Methods and Results We measured Ca 2+ -handling in isolated cardiomyocytes from C57BL/6J wild-type (WT) mice and mice lacking CaMKIIδ expression (CaMKIIδ-KO) or with deletion of the S -nitrosylation site on CaMKIIδ at Cys-273 or Cys-290 (CaMKIIδ-C273S and -C290A knock-in mice). Cardiomyocytes were exposed to NO donors, S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO; 150 μM), sodium nitroprusside (SNP; 200 μM) and/or β-adrenergic agonist isoproterenol (ISO; 100 nM). WT and CaMKIIδ-KO cardiomyocytes treated with GSNO showed no change in Ca 2+ transient or spark properties under baseline conditions (0.5 Hz stimulation frequency). Both WT and CaMKIIδ-KO cardiomyocytes responded to ISO with a full inotropic and lusitropic Ca 2+ transient response as well as increased Ca 2+ spark frequency. However, the increase in Ca 2+ spark frequency was significantly attenuated in CaMKIIδ-KO cardiomyocytes. The protection from ISO-induced Ca 2+ sparks and waves was mimicked by GSNO pre-treatment in WT cardiomyocytes, but lost in CaMKIIδ-C273S cardiomyocytes that displayed a robust increase in Ca 2+ waves. This observation is consistent with CaMKIIδ-C273 S -nitrosylation being critical in limiting ISO-induced arrhythmogenic sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca 2+ leak. When GSNO was applied after ISO this protection was not observed in WT or CaMKIIδ-C273S but was apparent in CaMKIIδ-C290A. In Langendorff-perfused isolated hearts, GSNO pre-treatment limited ISO-induced arrhythmias in WT but not CaMKIIδ-C273S hearts, while GSNO exposure after ISO sustained or exacerbated arrhythmic events. Conclusions We conclude that prior S -nitrosylation of CaMKIIδ at Cys-273 can limit subsequent β-AR induced arrhythmias, but that S -nitrosylation at Cys-290 might worsen or sustain β-AR-induced arrhythmias. This has important implications for the administration of NO donors in the clinical setting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Power et al. (2023) studied Ventricular arrhythmias. Nitric oxide donors (GSNO, SNP) and beta-adrenergic stimulation (Isoproterenol) vs. Baseline/Control buffer or Wild-type vs Mutant was evaluated on Ca2+ spark frequency and ventricular arrhythmias. Prior S-nitrosylation of CaMKIIδ at Cys-273 by NO donors limits subsequent β-adrenergic induced arrhythmias, whereas S-nitrosylation at Cys-290 worsens or sustains them.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: