Key result
Proarrhythmic drugs significantly enhanced transmural dispersion of repolarization (P<0.03), whereas nonproarrhythmic drugs did not, suggesting TDR is a superior preclinical marker of proarrhythmic risk.
Why the study?
Does drug-induced enhancement of transmural dispersion of repolarization (TDR) predict proarrhythmia better than QT interval prolongation in canine wedge preparations?
Does drug-induced enhancement of transmural dispersion of repolarization (TDR) predict proarrhythmia better than QT interval prolongation in canine wedge preparations?
p-value: p=<0.03
Transmural dispersion of repolarization (TDR) is a superior preclinical marker compared to QT prolongation for predicting drug-induced proarrhythmic risk.
TDR may outperform QT for TdP risk screening; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
Torsade de Pointes (TdP) proarrhythmia is a major complication of therapeutic drugs that block the delayed rectifier current. QT interval prolongation, the principal marker used to screen drugs for proarrhythmia, is both insensitive and nonspecific. Consequently, better screening methods are needed. Drug-induced transmural dispersion of repolarization (TDR) is mechanistically linked to TdP. Therefore, we hypothesized that drug-induced enhancement of TDR is more predictive of proarrhythmia than QT interval. High-resolution transmural optical action potential mapping was performed in canine wedge preparations (n = 19) at baseline and after perfusion with 4 different QT prolonging drugs at clinically relevant concentrations. Two proarrhythmic drugs in patients (bepridil and E4031) were compared with 2 nonproarrhythmic drugs (risperidone and verapamil). Both groups prolonged the QT (all P < 0.02), least with the proarrhythmic drug bepridil, reaffirming that QT is a poor predictor of TdP. In contrast, TDR was enhanced only by proarrhythmic drugs (P < 0.03). Increased TDR was due to a preferential prolongation of midmyocardial cell, relative to epicardial cell, APD, whereas nonproarrhythmic drugs similarly prolonged both cell types. In contrast to QT prolongation, augmentation of TDR was induced by proarrhythmic but not nonproarrhythmic drugs, suggesting TDR is a superior preclinical marker of proarrhythmic risk during drug development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Said et al. (2012) studied Drug-induced proarrhythmia (n=19). Proarrhythmic drugs (bepridil and E4031) vs. Nonproarrhythmic drugs (risperidone and verapamil) was evaluated on Enhancement of transmural dispersion of repolarization (TDR) (p=<0.03). Proarrhythmic drugs significantly enhanced transmural dispersion of repolarization (P<0.03), whereas nonproarrhythmic drugs did not, suggesting TDR is a superior preclinical marker of proarrhythmic risk.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: