Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background and context Some skills taught in introductory programming courses are categorized into 1) explaining code, 2) arranging lines of code in correct sequence, 3) tracing through the execution of a program and 4) writing code from scratch.Objective Knowing if a programming skill is a prerequisite to another would benefit teachers in properly planning the course and structuring the order in which they present activities relating to new content. Prior attempts to establish a skill hierarchy have suffered from methodological issues.Method In this study, we used the conviction measure from association rule mining to perform pair-wise comparisons of five skills: Write, Trace, Reverse trace, Sequence and Explain code. We used the data from four exams with more than 600 participants where students solved programming assignments of different skills for several programming topics.Findings Our findings matched the previous finding that tracing is a prerequisite for students to learn to write code. Contradicting the previous claims, our analysis showed that using the mean threshold writing code is a prerequisite to explaining code. However, there is no clear relationship when we change the threshold to the median. Unlike prior work, we did not find a clear prerequisite relationship between sequencing code and writing or explaining code.Implications Our research can help instructors by systematically arranging the skills students exercise when encountering a new topic. The goal is to help instructors properly teach and assess programming in a fashion most effective for learning by leveraging the relationship between skills.
Newar et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: