Key result
Low-dose and long-course tirofiban significantly improved early neurological function in patients with large hemispheric infarction, demonstrating a greater reduction in NIHSS score at discharge compared to clopidogrel (OR 0.006).
Why the study?
The clinical efficacy and safety of tirofiban in the treatment of large hemispheric infarction remained controversial.
Does low-dose, long-course intravenous tirofiban improve early neurological function and reduce mortality compared to clopidogrel in patients with acute large hemispheric infarction?
RCT (n=71)
Randomly assigned
No
Does low-dose, long-course intravenous tirofiban improve early neurological function and reduce mortality compared to clopidogrel in patients with acute large hemispheric infarction?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports adjunctive tirofiban in acute LHI; extends limited RCT data amid prior controversy.
Background The clinical efficacy and safety of tirofiban in the treatment of large hemispheric infarction (LHI) remain controversial. Methods This study prospectively enrolled patients with acute LHI who were admitted to Putuo Hospital affiliated with Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine from June 2021 to December 2021. The patients were randomly assigned to the tirofiban group [3–4 μg/(kg·h)] or control group (clopidogrel 75 mg/d). Results A total of 71 patients with acute LHI were selected: 36 in the tirofiban group and 35 in the control group. The reduction of the NIHSS score in the tirofiban group was 2.92 ± 9.31 at discharge, and that of the control group was −3.23 ± 12.06 ( p = 0.021, OR , 0.006; 95% CI , 0.004–0.008). Six patients (16.7%) in tirofiban group and 14 patients (40%) in control group died during hospitalization ( p = 0.029, OR , 0.300; 95% CI , 0.099–0.908). There was significant difference in Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 5–6 scores at 90 days between the two groups ( p = 0.023, OR , 0.327; 95% CI , 0.124–0.867). However, there was no significant difference in mRS 0–1 ( p = 0.321, OR , 0.972; 95% CI , 0.920–1.027), mRS 2 ( p = 0.572, OR , 2.00; 95% CI , 0.173–23.109), mRS 3 ( p = 0.225, OR , 2.214; 95% CI , 0.601–8.161), or mRS 4( p = 0.284, OR , 1.859; 95% CI , 0.593–5.825) scores between the two groups. There was no difference in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage ( p = 0.29, OR , 0.305; 95% CI , 0.030–3.081), asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage ( p = 0.123, OR , 0.284; 95% CI , 0.053–1.518). There was a significant difference in systemic bleeding events during hospitalization ( p = 0.044, OR , 0.309; 95% CI , 0.096–1.000). Conclusions Low-dose and long-course tirofiban treatment may significantly improve the early neurological function and reduce the in-hospital mortality in LHI patients. Meanwhile, tirofiban does not increase the risk of any type of bleeding events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in Acute large hemispheric infarction (LHI) (n=71). Tirofiban vs. Clopidogrel 75 mg/d was evaluated on Reduction of NIHSS score at discharge (OR 0.006, 95% CI 0.004-0.008, p=0.021). Low-dose and long-course tirofiban significantly improved early neurological function in patients with large hemispheric infarction, demonstrating a greater reduction in NIHSS score at discharge compared to clopidogrel (OR 0.006).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: