Key result
Low-dose tirofiban significantly improved early neurological function compared to clopidog
Why the study?
The clinical efficacy and safety of tirofiban in the treatment of large hemispheric infarction remain controversial.
Does low-dose and long-course tirofiban improve early neurological function and reduce mortality in patients with acute large hemispheric infarction compared to clopidogrel?
RCT (n=71)
Randomly assigned
No
Does low-dose and long-course tirofiban improve early neurological function and reduce mortality in patients with acute large hemispheric infarction compared to clopidogrel?
Low-dose, long-course intravenous tirofiban significantly improved early neurological function and reduced in-hospital mortality compared to clopidogrel in patients with acute large hemispheric infarction, without increasing bleeding risk.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Tirofiban may improve early neurological function and reduce in-hospital mortality in LHI; extends limited RCT evidence in this controversial setting.
Background: The clinical efficacy and safety of tirofiban in the treatment of large hemispheric infarction (LHI) remain controversial. Methods: This study prospectively enrolled patients with acute LHI who were admitted to Putuo Hospital affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine from June 2021 to December 2021. The patients were randomly assigned to the tirofiban group (3-4 µg/(kg·h)) or control group (clopidogrel 75 mg/d). Results: A total of 71 patients with acute LHI were selected: 36 in tirofiban group and 35 in control group.The reduction of the NIHSS score in tirofiban group was 2.92±9.31 at discharge, and that of the control group was -3.23±12.06 (P=0.021, OR, 0.006; 95% CI, 0.004-0.008). Sixteen patients (16.7%) in tirofiban group and 14 patients (40%) in control group died during hospitalization (P=0.029, OR, 3.333; 95% CI, 1.102-10.088). There was significant difference in mRS 5-6 scores at 90 days between the two groups (P=0.023, OR, 3.055; 95% CI, 1.154-8.088). Howere,there was no difference in mRS 0-1 (P=0.321, OR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.396-0.632),mRS 2 (P=0.572, OR, 0.579; 95% CI, 0.043-5.777) or mRS 3 (P=0.225, OR, 0.452; 95% CI, 0.123-1.665) scores between the two groups. There was no difference in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (P=0.29, OR, 3.281; 95% CI, 0.325-33.169) ,asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (P=0.123, OR, 3.517; 95% CI, 0.659-18.782) or systemic bleeding events during hospitalization (P=0.044, OR, 3.235; 95% CI, 1.00-10.469). Conclusions: Low-dose and long-course tirofiban treatment can significantly improve the early neurological function and reduce the in-hospital mortality in LHI patients. It also can improve the quality of life and ability of daily living at 90 days.Meanwhile, tirofiban do not increase the risk of any type of bleeding events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in Acute large hemispheric infarction (n=71). Tirofiban vs. Clopidogrel 75 mg/d was evaluated on Reduction in NIHSS score at discharge (OR 0.006, 95% CI 0.004-0.008, p=0.021). Low-dose tirofiban significantly improved early neurological function compared to clopidog.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: