Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction: Routine pneumococcal vaccination for adults aged ≥60 or ≥65 years and those with underlying at-risk and high-risk conditions is recommended in many countries. However, studies estimating the effectiveness of 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) have revealed mixed results, partly due to variability in study design and endpoints used to assess outcomes.Areas covered: The authors conducted a literature review of independently randomized trials and real-world studies published from 2010 to 2020 that assessed the effectiveness and efficacy of PPSV23 against vaccine-type or any-serotype invasive and noninvasive pneumococcal disease in adults aged ≥60 years. The authors also evaluated differences in study design that may contribute to the heterogeneity of available evidence.Expert opinion: Policy decisions regarding the inclusion of vaccines into national immunization plans should consider study quality and limitations. This review shows that PPSV23 is effective against vaccine-type invasive pneumococcal disease and vaccine-type pneumococcal pneumonia and can lower the burden of vaccine-type pneumococcal pneumonia. PPSV23-conferred protection may be lower in adults aged ≥75 years, those with certain underlying conditions, and individuals who were vaccinated >5 years before disease onset. This is an important finding that supports the benefit of PPSV23 vaccination for older adults.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Niederman et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: