Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review reveals negative impacts of age discrimination on younger adults' career progression, indicating the need for intervention.
Applying Social Identity Theory, this systematic review explores age discrimination faced by younger adults, specifically Millennials (1981–1996) and Gen Z (1997–2012), in academic and professional fields. Three significant studies demonstrating the negative impact of age discrimination on career progression were identified through a rigorous PRISMA review. The analysis demonstrates the manifestation of workplace discrimination in recruitment and compensation procedures, academic obstacles encountered in research funding, and the psychological effects on workplace performance. Systemic barriers hindering career advancement and the psychological toll of age discrimination are illuminated by these findings, which also suggest evidence-based strategies for creating more inclusive professional environments. Moreover, this review’s findings indicate three interrelated patterns: the competence-credibility paradox, retrospective bias amplification, and cumulative disadvantage, which inform policy, legislative, and early educational interventions designed to reduce age discrimination in the workplace, culminating in a call for action.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hulus et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: