Key result
Thrombolysis is linked to eliminating the ~12-point female disadvantage in post-stroke recovery.
Cohort
Yes
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: Stroke thrombolysis may have a differential effect by sex. We sought to examine the relationship between sex and outcome after thrombolysis. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of stroke patients from the Registry of Canadian Stroke Network phase 1 (June 2001-February 2002) and phase 2 (June 2002-December 2002). Variables including demographics, history, clinical data, process measures, and outcome were analyzed. The primary outcomes were the Stroke Impact Scale-16 score (SIS-16) and mortality at 6 months. We compared the outcomes of the thrombolyzed and nonthrombolyzed cohorts and examined the data for a tissue plasminogen activator (tPA)-by-sex interaction on the 2 primary outcomes. RESULTS: The overall proportion of patients who achieved an excellent outcome (SIS-16 >75) was not different by gender. However, the proportion of patients achieving an excellent outcome in the non-tPA cohort was much greater in males, with an absolute risk difference of 11.8%. A multiplicative treatment by sex interaction was evident (p = 0.054). This interaction was not present for stroke case fatality. CONCLUSIONS: Women fared poorly compared to men in the placebo groups, but this negative prognostic sex effect was neutralized by thrombolysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shobha et al. (2010) conducted a cohort in stroke. Tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) thrombolysis vs. Nonthrombolyzed (no tPA) was evaluated on Stroke Impact Scale-16 score (SIS-16) and mortality at 6 months (p=0.054). Thrombolysis neutralized a negative prognostic sex effect in stroke patients; in the untreated cohort, males had an 11.8% higher absolute rate of excellent outcome than females (interaction p=0.054).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: