Key result
Adherence to evidence-based guidelines for VTE treatment duration was low (36.1%), and non-adherence was not significantly associated with mortality, hospitalization, or costs.
Why the study?
Prevention of recurrent VTE is a primary goal, but the extent of physician adherence to evidence-based guideline recommendations remains unknown.
Does adherence to evidence-based guidelines for anticoagulant duration improve clinical outcomes and reduce costs in patients with VTE?
Cohort
Does adherence to evidence-based guidelines for anticoagulant duration improve clinical outcomes and reduce costs in patients with VTE?
Adherence to evidence-based guidelines for VTE secondary prevention is low (36.1%) and often results in overtreatment, but non-adherence was not significantly associated with adverse clinical outcomes or increased costs in this Swiss cohort.
Low VTE guideline adherence lacked outcome impact; challenges duration mandates and leaves open prospective trials.
Background: Prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) is considered a main goal of VTE management. However, the extent to which physicians adhere to the recommendations from evidence-based guidelines is unknown. Aim: From a large, prospective clinical cohort, we aimed to (1) quantify the adherence of treatment recommendations to evidence-based guidelines and establish its predictors, and (2) estimate its impact on clinical outcomes and costs in patients with VTE. Methods: was assessed in terms of duration of anticoagulant treatment. Data on death were obtained from the Swiss Central Compensation Office. Health care claims data recorded between 2014 and 2019 were retrieved from Helsana, one of the largest Swiss health insurance companies. Results: The adherence to evidence-based guidelines was 36.1%. Among patients with non-adherence, overtreatment was present in 70.1%. Significant patient-related predictors of guideline adherence were (a) age above 50 years, (b) male sex, (c) pulmonary embolism, (d) unprovoked VTE, (e) multiple VTE, (f) laboratory tests not ordered, and (g) various cardiovascular comorbidities. Non-adherence was not significantly associated with mortality, hospitalization, admission to nursing home, and costs. Conclusions: The adherence to evidence-based guidelines was low, and several unrelated predictors appeared. Although these results need to be confirmed in other settings, they highlight the need for implementation of evidence-based guidelines in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mertins et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Venous thromboembolism. Adherence to evidence-based guidelines vs. Non-adherence was evaluated on Adherence to evidence-based guidelines. Adherence to evidence-based guidelines for VTE treatment duration was low (36.1%), and non-adherence was not significantly associated with mortality, hospitalization, or costs.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: