Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
November 1, 2019Clinical ophthalmologyOpen Access

Visual Outcomes, Visual Quality and Patient Satisfaction: Comparing a Blended Bifocal Approach to Bilateral Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens Implantation

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

MHMatthew D. HammondHenry Ford Macomb HospitalRPRichard PotvinControl Vision (United States)

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Hammond et al. (2019) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a62a3fee1c6576da5097e43https://doi.org/10.2147/opth.s232800
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Medium-Term Visual Outcomes of Apodized Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lens with +3.00 D Addition Power2014 · 10 citations
  2. 2Comparison of Two Multifocal Intraocular Lens Designs That Differ Only in Near Add2014 · 36 citations
  3. 3Visual outcomes of patients bilaterally implanted with the extended range of vision intraocular lens: A prospective study2018 · 52 citations
  4. 4Comparison of visual outcomes after implantation of diffractive trifocal toric intraocular lens and a diffractive apodized bifocal toric intraocular lens2016 · 49 citations
  5. 5Bilateral implantation of +2.5 D multifocal intraocular lens and contralateral implantation of +2.5 D and +3.0 D multifocal intraocular lenses: Clinical outcomes2016 · 37 citations