Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Radial and transverse teleseismic receiver functions (RFs) at GSN station ARU, in central Eurasia, display variation in back‐azimuth ψ consistent with a 1‐D anisotropic crustal structure. In a broad ψ range, the transverse RFs possess a strong phase at ∼5‐sec delay relative to direct P, with a polarity reversal at ψ ∼ 50°. The radial RFs peak at the transyerse‐RF polarity reversal for this converted phase. The first motion of the transverse RFs varies with ψ also, reversing polarity at ψ ∼ 345°. The azimuthal variation can be modeled by a 5‐layer velocity profile with substantial (15%) seismic anisotropy in both the lowermost crust and a low‐velocity surface layer. Assuming hexagonal symmetry, the lowermost crust has a tilted “slow” symmetry axis i.e. an oblate phase velocity surface. The strike of the axis is oblique to the north‐south Urals trend, but deviates <20° from the mantle fast‐axis inferred from SKS splitting. The magnitude and tilt of the model's anisotropy suggests that fine layering and/or aligned cracks augment mineral‐orientation anisotropy near the top and bottom of the crust.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Levin et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: