Key result
Noninvasive BP monitoring using earlobe and toe photoplethysmograms estimated systolic and diastolic BPs with mean errors of +0.3 ± 4.9 and +0.1 ± 3.2 mmHg compared to invasive monitoring.
Why the study?
Continuous noninvasive blood pressure monitoring was evaluated as an alternative to inconvenient invasive monitoring by using conventional clinical monitoring systems to acquire two photoplethysmogram signals.
Does noninvasive blood pressure monitoring using two PPG signals and a convolutional neural network accurately estimate blood pressure compared to invasive monitoring in post-cardiovascular surgery patients?
Observational (n=14)
Does noninvasive blood pressure monitoring using two PPG signals and a convolutional neural network accurately estimate blood pressure compared to invasive monitoring in post-cardiovascular surgery patients?
Effect estimate: Mean error +0.3 ± 4.9 mmHg (systolic) and +0.1 ± 3.2 mmHg (diastolic)
A novel noninvasive blood pressure monitoring system using dual PPG signals and deep learning achieved high accuracy comparable to invasive monitoring, offering a potential alternative in clinical settings.
May enable continuous noninvasive BP monitoring post-surgery; leaves open prospective validation in larger cohorts before clinical adoption.
Blood pressure is a reliable indicator of many cardiac arrhythmias and rheological problems. This study proposes a clinical set-up using conventional monitoring systems to estimate systolic and diastolic blood pressures continuously based on two photoplethysmogram signals (PPG) taken from the earlobe and toe. Several amendments were applied to conventional clinical monitoring devices to construct our project plan. We used two monitors to acquire two PPGs, one ECG, and invasive blood pressure as the reference to evaluate the estimation accuracy. One of the most critical requirements was the synchronization of the acquired signals that was accomplished by using ECG as the time reference. Following data acquisition and preparation procedures, the performance of each PPG signal alone and together was investigated using deep convolutional neural networks. The proposed architecture was evaluated on 32 records acquired from 14 patients after cardiovascular surgery. The results showed a better performance for toe PPG in comparison with earlobe PPG. Moreover, they indicated the algorithm accuracy improves if both signals are applied together to the network. According to the British Hypertension Society standards, the results achieved grade A for both blood pressure measurements. The mean and standard deviation of estimation errors were +0.3 ± 4.9 and +0.1 ± 3.2 mmHg for systolic and diastolic BPs, respectively. Since the method is based on conventional monitoring equipment and provides a high estimation consistency, it can be considered as a possible alternative for inconvenient invasive BP monitoring in clinical environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Esmaelpoor et al. (2021) conducted an observational in cardiovascular surgery (n=14). Noninvasive blood pressure monitoring using two photoplethysmograms and convolutional neural networks vs. Invasive blood pressure monitoring was evaluated on Estimation accuracy of systolic and diastolic blood pressures (Mean error +0.3 ± 4.9 mmHg (systolic) and +0.1 ± 3.2 mmHg (diastolic)). Noninvasive BP monitoring using earlobe and toe photoplethysmograms estimated systolic and diastolic BPs with mean errors of +0.3 ± 4.9 and +0.1 ± 3.2 mmHg compared to invasive monitoring.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: