AN INTERNATIONAL CONSENSUS FOR PROTECTING THE rights and interests of research subjects has emerged in a process that began with the Declaration of Helsinki and continues in the development of official guidelines as well as a growing scholarly literature. Despite this consensus, legitimate ethical controversies persist. This article discusses points of consensus and controversy in clinical research ethics, focusing on substantive, rather than procedural, concerns.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brody et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: