Key result
During the hypoxemic phase of breath-holding with whole-body immersion, breath-hold divers experienced significantly more arrhythmic events compared to the normoxic phase (5.9 vs 0.4; p<0.05).
Why the study?
Breath-hold divers develop cardiac autonomic changes and brady-arrhythmias during prolonged breath-holding, but the effects of breath-hold-induced hypoxemia on autonomic status and arrhythmogenesis compared to non-divers required investigation.
Does prolonged breath-holding induce cardiac autonomic changes and arrhythmogenesis in trained breath-hold divers compared to non-divers?
Observational (n=18)
Does prolonged breath-holding induce cardiac autonomic changes and arrhythmogenesis in trained breath-hold divers compared to non-divers?
Absolute Event Rate: 5.9% vs 0.4%
p-value: p=<0.05
Prolonged breath-holding in trained divers induces significant cardiac autonomic changes characterized by synergistic sympathetic and parasympathetic co-activation, leading to increased bradycardia and arrhythmic events.
Hypoxemia during breath-holding may heighten arrhythmia risk in divers; leaves open whether training alters autonomic responses in clinical settings.
Breath‐hold divers are known to develop cardiac autonomic changes and brady‐arrthymias during prolonged breath‐holding (BH). The effects of BH‐induced hypoxemia were investigated upon both cardiac autonomic status and arrhythmogenesis by comparing breath‐hold divers (BHDs) to non‐divers (NDs). Eighteen participants (9 BHDs, 9 NDs) performed a maximal voluntary BH with face immersion. BHDs were asked to perform an additional BH at water surface to increase the degree of hypoxemia. Beat‐to‐beat changes in heart rate (HR), short‐term fractal scaling exponent (DFAα1), the number of arrhythmic events [premature ventricular contractions (PVCs), premature atrial contractions (PACs)] and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO 2 ) were recorded during and immediately following BH. The corrected QT‐intervals (QTc) were analyzed pre‐ and post‐acute BH. A regression‐based model was used to split BH into a normoxic (NX) and a hypoxemic phase (HX). During the HX phase of BH, BHDs showed a progressive decrease in DFAα1 during BH with face immersion ( p < 0.01) and BH with whole‐body immersion ( p < 0.01) whereas NDs did not ( p > 0.05). In addition, BHDs had more arrhythmic events during the HX of BH with whole‐body immersion when compared to the corresponding NX phase (5.9 ± 6.7 vs 0.4 ± 1.3; p < 0.05; respectively). The number of PVCs was negatively correlated with SpO 2 during BH with whole‐body immersion ( r = −0.72; p < 0.05). The hypoxemic stage of voluntary BH is concomitant with significant cardiac autonomic changes toward a synergistic sympathetic and parasympathetic stimulation. Co‐activation led ultimately to increased bradycardic response and cardiac electrophysiological disturbances.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Costalat et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Healthy participants (breath-hold divers and non-divers) (n=18). Maximal voluntary breath-holding vs. Non-divers / Normoxic phase was evaluated on Number of arrhythmic events during the hypoxemic phase of breath-holding with whole-body immersion compared to the normoxic phase in breath-hold divers (p=<0.05). During the hypoxemic phase of breath-holding with whole-body immersion, breath-hold divers experienced significantly more arrhythmic events compared to the normoxic phase (5.9 vs 0.4; p<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: