Key result
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound significantly improved carotid IMT visualization compared with B-mode imaging (94% vs 61% for right carotid, P<0.001) and detected more plaques (367 vs 350, P=0.02).
Why the study?
Does contrast-enhanced ultrasound improve visualization of intima-media thickness and detection of plaques compared to B-mode ultrasound in asymptomatic individuals?
Cross-Sectional (n=175)
Does contrast-enhanced ultrasound improve visualization of intima-media thickness and detection of plaques compared to B-mode ultrasound in asymptomatic individuals?
Absolute Event Rate: 94% vs 61%
p-value: p=<.001
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound provides superior visualization of the carotid intima-media complex and detects more plaques than standard B-mode ultrasound in asymptomatic individuals.
BACKGROUND: Carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) and plaque are recognized markers of increased risk for cerebrovascular events. Accurate visualization of the IMT and plaques is dependent upon image quality. Ultrasound contrast agents improve image quality during echocardiography-this study assessed whether contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) improves carotid IMT visualization and plaque detection in an asymptomatic population. METHODS & RESULTS: Individuals free from known cardiovascular disease, enrolled in a community study, underwent B-mode and CEUS carotid imaging. Each carotid artery was divided into 10 segments (far and near walls of the proximal, mid and distal segments of the common carotid artery, the carotid bulb, and internal carotid artery). Visualization of the IMT complex and plaque assessments was made during both B-mode and CEUS imaging for all enrolled subjects, a total of 175 individuals (mean age 65±9 years). Visualization of the IMT was significantly improved during CEUS compared with B-mode imaging, in both near and far walls of the carotid arteries (% IMT visualization during B-mode vs CEUS imaging: 61% vs 94% and 66% vs 95% for right and left carotid arteries, respectively, P<.001 for both). Additionally, a greater number of plaques were detected during CEUS imaging compared with B-mode imaging (367 plaques vs 350 plaques, P=.02). CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound improves visualization of the intima-media complex, in both near and far walls, of the common and internal carotid arteries and permits greater detection of carotid plaques. Further studies are required to determine whether there is incremental clinical and prognostic benefit related to superior plaque detection by CEUS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shah et al. (2017) conducted a cross-sectional in Asymptomatic (free from known cardiovascular disease) (n=175). Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) vs. B-mode ultrasound was evaluated on IMT visualization (right carotid artery) (p=<.001). Contrast-enhanced ultrasound significantly improved carotid IMT visualization compared with B-mode imaging (94% vs 61% for right carotid, P<0.001) and detected more plaques (367 vs 350, P=0.02).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: