Key result
A 12-week combined program of aerobic interval, inspiratory muscle, and resistance training improved ejection fraction by 29% (p<0.001) and exercise time by 68.5% (p=0.001) in heart failure patients.
Why the study?
The study evaluated combinations of aerobic interval, inspiratory muscle, and resistance training on cardiac function, exercise capacity, and dyspnoea in heart failure to identify optimal exercise regimens for cardiac rehabilitation.
Does combining aerobic interval, inspiratory muscle, and resistance training improve cardiac function and exercise capacity more than single modalities in patients with heart failure?
RCT (n=60)
randomized
Does combining aerobic interval, inspiratory muscle, and resistance training improve cardiac function and exercise capacity more than single modalities in patients with heart failure?
p-value: p=<0.001
A comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation protocol combining aerobic interval, inspiratory muscle, and resistance training provides superior improvements in cardiac remodeling and exercise capacity for heart failure patients compared to fewer modalities.
Combined multimodal training may aid HF rehab; leaves open optimal regimen and clinical adoption pending larger trials.
Aim The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of a combined program of two or three modalities: aerobic interval training (AIT), inspiratory muscle training (IMT), and resistance training (RT), on cardiac function, exercise capacity and dyspnoea in heart failure (HF). Moreover, this study aims to find the best training exercise that could have additional benefits on measured parameters, thus providing a novel application in cardiac rehabilitation programs.Methods 60 patients with HF, left ventricle ejection fraction ≤45% and inspiratory muscle weakness were randomly assigned to one of the six following groups (n = 10, for each group): Control, AIT, IMT, RT, AIT + IMT and AIT + IMT + RT (combined group: CT). AIT was performed at 60% of maximum heart rate, IMT at 60% of maximal inspiratory pressure and RT at 60% of 1 repetition maximum. The control group patients had no training at all. The training regimens were performed 3 times per week for 12 weeks.Results All groups showed significant positive effects on almost all the measured parameters. However, the combination of IMT to AIT and the addition of RT to IMT and AIT (CT group) were the most powerful modalities and resulted in additional benefits over all training modalities. For example, the improvements (post-training vs pre-training) on ejection fraction was 29% (p < 0.001) and on exercise time 68.5% (p = 0.001) in CT group. However, the improvements for the same parameters were lower in AIT + IMT group (ejection fraction 18% (p < 0.001) and exercise time 62% (p < 0.001)).Conclusion The addition of RT to AIT and IMT (CT group) resulted in additional benefits in some of the measured parameters over the double combined group: AIT + IMT and all training modalities, which make the combination of three exercise training the most recommended protocol in cardiac rehabilitation programs and prevention protocols.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sadek et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Heart failure (n=60). Combined aerobic interval, inspiratory muscle, and resistance training vs. Control, single, or double training modalities was evaluated on Cardiac function (ejection fraction) and exercise capacity (exercise time) (p=<0.001). A 12-week combined program of aerobic interval, inspiratory muscle, and resistance training improved ejection fraction by 29% (p<0.001) and exercise time by 68.5% (p=0.001) in heart failure patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: