Diabetics with myocardial infarction had significantly lower capillary densities than normoglycaemic patients with infarcts, suggesting inadequate ischaemia-induced reactive angiogenesis.
Cross-Sectional (n=44)
Diabetic patients with myocardial infarction exhibit significantly lower capillary densities, suggesting impaired reactive angiogenesis that may contribute to increased myocardial vulnerability and diabetic cardiomyopathy.
The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that excessive severity of ischaemic heart disease in diabetics is due, in part, to capillary inadequacy. Sections from autopsied hearts of diabetic patients with and without myocardial infarction as well as from those of patients with infarcts and no diabetes were used for morphometric studies of intramural microvessels in areas without infarction. Normoglycaemic patients with normal hearts were also examined. Two to five transverse sections from each of 44 hearts (stained with methenamine silver) were examined for capillary numerical density, capillary to myofibre ratios, and myofibre diameters. Averages for each case and totals for each group were calculated and compared. Normoglycaemic patients with infarcts had increased morphometric values. Diabetics with infarcts had significantly lower capillary densities than the other groups. In conclusion, it is suggested that in diabetes there is an inadequate ischaemia-induced, reactive angiogenesis. This may contribute towards increased myocardial vulnerability in further ischaemic injury and perhaps to diabetic cardiomyopathy.
Yarom et al. (Sun,) conducted a cross-sectional in Diabetes and myocardial infarction (n=44). Diabetes vs. Normoglycaemia was evaluated on Capillary numerical density, capillary to myofibre ratios, and myofibre diameters. Diabetics with myocardial infarction had significantly lower capillary densities than normoglycaemic patients with infarcts, suggesting inadequate ischaemia-induced reactive angiogenesis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: