Key result
Percutaneous transfemoral access for transcatheter aortic valve implantation is increasingly replacing surgical cutdown due to improved technology, closure devices, and the need to reduce hospital stay.
Why the study?
What are the temporal trends, advantages, disadvantages, and best practices of percutaneous versus surgical transfemoral access for TAVI in patients with severe aortic stenosis?
What are the temporal trends, advantages, disadvantages, and best practices of percutaneous versus surgical transfemoral access for TAVI in patients with severe aortic stenosis?
This review highlights the shift towards fully percutaneous transfemoral access for TAVI and outlines best practices for safe access.
Trends support percutaneous access to shorten TAVI stays; leaves open randomized safety comparisons.
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation is an important therapeutic option for patients with symptomatic, severe aortic stenosis at increased risk for open surgical aortic valve replacement. Although a number of alternative vascular access sites have been developed, transfemoral access is overwhelmingly the dominant access strategy for this procedure. Access was achieved in the initial clinical experience primarily via surgical cutdown, but more recently, there has been increasing use of a fully percutaneous approach. This is likely driven by improvements in technology, more experience with large bore vascular closure devices (VCDs), and pressures to reduce hospital length of stay. This review will describe temporal trends of percutaneous versus surgical transfemoral access, identify the advantages and disadvantages of each approach, and describe the best practices for achieving safe transfemoral percutaneous access.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vora et al. (2018) conducted a review in Symptomatic, severe aortic stenosis. Percutaneous transfemoral access vs. Surgical cutdown transfemoral access was evaluated. Percutaneous transfemoral access for transcatheter aortic valve implantation is increasingly replacing surgical cutdown due to improved technology, closure devices, and the need to reduce hospital stay.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: