PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 2002The American Journal of Gastroenterology286 citations

Using breath tests wisely in a gastroenterology practice: an evidence-based review of indications and pitfalls in interpretation

View Full Paper
JRJoseph RomagnuoloDSDan SchillerRBRobert J. Bailey

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Breath tests are a simple and safe alternative to more invasive investigation strategies for many gastroenterological conditions. Both the hydrogen breath tests and the new 13C stable radioisotope breath tests are nonradioactive and safe in children and pregnancy. The range of diseases that can be identified include Helicobacter pylori infection, lactose and fructose intolerance, bacterial overgrowth, bile salt wastage, pancreatic insufficiency, liver dysfunction, and abnormal small bowel transit. In this review, the physiology supporting these tests and the principles of normal gas dynamics in the gut are briefly reviewed and then related to the test preparation and interpretation in two parts: 1) detection of H. pylori and 2) small bowel, pancreatic, and hepatobiliary disorders. A MEDLINE search reviewing all English language abstracts from 1966 to March, 2001 was performed, with an additional review of abstracts from major national meetings from 1997 to 2001. Using the information from this review, the performance characteristics of the various tests were detailed, and an attempt is made to provide some literature-based guidance regarding their indications and limitations. The interpretation of "flat" breath tests and the selective use of methane collection and colonic alkalinization are discussed. Breath tests are valuable tools that are, in general, underutilized in evaluating dyspepsia and functional bloating and diarrhea, as well as suspected malabsorption, including lactose intolerance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Romagnuolo et al. (2002) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a62d0c7aca57fe96528655dhttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05664.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Lansoprazole and ranitidine affect the accuracy of the 14C-urea breath test by a pH-dependent mechanism.1997 · 113 citations
  2. 2Factors influencing the 1-g 14C-D-xylose breath test for bacterial overgrowth.1995 · 44 citations
  3. 313C-urea versus 14C-urea breath test1998 · 7 citations
  4. 4Eradicating Helicobacter pylori in non-ulcer dyspepsia may not be cost effective2001 · 3 citations
  5. 5H. pylori “test and treat” or prompt endoscopy for dyspeptic patients in primary care. A randomized controlled trial of two management strategies: One year follow-up1998 · 24 citations