Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analytical comparison reveals PM machines achieve higher torque densities in low-speed settings, with design implications.
This paper presents the simplified analytical optimization and comparison between electrically excited (EE) and permanent-magnet (PM) machines in terms of torque per volume T/V and torque per weight T/G for low-speed applications when their copper loss and overall size are the same. Analytical torque models for both machines are individually developed and optimized to obtain the optimal flux density ratio, split ratio, and maximum torque densities. Furthermore, the variation of optima with the number of poles and machine size is also investigated. The analytical analyses are validated by both finite-element analyses and experiments. It is concluded that torque densities of PM machines can be more than √2 times higher than those of EE machines. For EE machines, there is an optimal pole number to maximize torque densities, and large volume applications are preferred. In actual applications, EE machines are more likely to compromise the torque density to meet the thermal constraints. It also shows that the optimal T/G designs have significantly higher split ratio and are more cost- and weight-effective than the optimal T/V designs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chu et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: